Process
How I use my recent trades to decide when to be in the market and when to step aside.
Nick SchmidtPublishedUpdated
In this concept
When the market gets tougher and my trades stop working, my worst response is to get frustrated and push harder. I have sized up to make back what I lost, forced trades that were not there, and convinced myself I just needed to try harder. One bad trade was rarely the real problem. The damage came when I ignored the feedback and kept pressing.
Something I figured out over time is that my recent trades give me enough information to adjust. If my last four or five trades are getting traction and my portfolio is making progress, I treat that as permission to stay in and press. If they are getting stopped out and I am flat on the year, I treat that as a reason to step aside. My performance is one input into how I read the environment, and it moves me in and out without requiring a market prediction.
Your Recent Trades
Positive Feedback
Get Aggressive
Negative Feedback
Get Defensive
Let the next trades confirm or change the mode
Feedback:
Trades getting traction. Portfolio making progress. New buys working quickly.
Psychology:
Progress feels automatic. I can get away with mistakes that would hurt in a weaker market.
Action:
Aggressive. Increase exposure. Larger positions.
Feedback:
Stops getting hit. Hard to make progress. Nothing sticks.
Psychology:
Frustrating. Feels like it should be working but it's not.
Action:
Defensive. Pilot positions only. Reduce exposure.
Feedback:
Almost nothing works. Losses mount. Bull traps tempt me back in.
Psychology:
Unforgiving. Bounces tempt me to call a bottom before my trades confirm it.
Action:
Full defensive. Cash.
Not every market feels the same in my account. When my trades work quickly and progress feels easier, I treat that as a stronger environment and consider increasing exposure. When my stops start getting hit and nothing sticks, I read that as choppy and shrink down to pilot positions. When almost nothing works at all, I get defensive and may go to cash.
What makes this useful to me is that my own results can challenge what I think I see in the indexes. Sometimes the market looks fine, but my stops are getting hit more, new buys are not following through, and the portfolio is not making progress. I do not assume that predicts what comes next. I take it as evidence that my current ideas are not working and adjust before I have a reason to press harder.
This process keeps me from going from zero to fully invested just because a bounce looks convincing. I start small, put on pilots, and only increase exposure after those trades begin to work. That progression is how I protect myself from turning one optimistic read into a large hit.
Two periods on SPY where my feedback turned negative. Trades stopped working, stops started hitting, and the loop moved me to reduce exposure and get more defensive. In these examples I pulled back before the correction, but the feedback was a risk signal from my own trades, not a prediction that the market had to decline.
I do not have to predict anything to use this. When my trades work, I can increase exposure. When they repeatedly fail, I pull back. The process does not guarantee that I am positioned perfectly, but it gives me a consistent way to correct my exposure as the evidence changes.
It also helps me interrupt two reactions I have seen in myself: wanting to size up after losses to make the money back, and wanting to get overly cautious after wins. The loop asks me to get smaller while I am losing and only get bigger after positions begin working. That can feel backwards, but it has helped me stay in the game.
The best stretches I have had were the ones where I traded the least and sat the longest. Negative feedback helps me sit, trade small, or not trade at all. When the feedback turns positive, it helps me lean into it and let winning trades work and play out instead of cutting them short. For me, this is a way to put more weight on timing than effort.
Want to know when something new is published?